Isotopic Abundance Analysis of Biofield Treated Benzene, Toluene and p-Xylene Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)
Mass Spectrometry & Purification Techniques
Received August 18, 2015; Accepted September 29, 2015; Published October 05, 2015
Trivedi MK, Branton A, Trivedi D, Nayak G, Saikia G, et al. (2015) Isotopic Abundance Analysis of Biofield Treated Benzene, Toluene and p-Xylene Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). Mass Spectrom Open Access 1:102. doi:10.4172/mso.1000102
Isotopic Abundance Analysis of Biofield Treated Benzene, Toluene and p-Xylene Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)
Benzene, toluene and p-xylene are derivatives of benzene, generally produced from crude petroleum and have numerous applications in industry. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of biofield treatment on isotopic abundance of these benzene derivatives by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Benzene, toluene and p-xylene samples were divided into two parts: control and treatment. Control part was remained as untreated and treatment part was subjected to Mr. Trivedi’s biofield treatment. Control and treated samples were characterized using GC-MS. GC-MS data revealed that isotopic abundance ratio of 13C/12C or 2H/1H (PM+1/PM) of treated samples were significantly increased from un-substituted to substituted benzene rings (where, PM- primary molecule, PM+1- isotopic molecule either for 13C/12C and/or 2H/1H). The isotopic abundance ratio of 13C/12C or 2H/1H (PM+1/PM) in benzene was decreased significantly by 42.14% as compared to control. However, the isotopic abundance ratio of (PM+1/PM) in treated toluene and p-xylene was significantly increased up to 531.61% and 134.34% respectively as compared to their respective control. Thus, overall data suggest that biofield treatment has significantly altered the isotopic abundance ratio of (PM+1/PM) in a different way for un-substituted and substituted benzenes.
Keywords: Biofield treatment; Benzene; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Toluene; p-xylene
GC-MS: Gas chromatography-Mass spectrometry; PM: Primary molecule; PM+1: Isotopic molecule either for 13C/12C or 2H/1H
Benzene, toluene and p-xylene isomers are nonpolar organic liquid, volatile, aromatic and the most important constituents of gasoline (Figure 1). Benzene, toluene and p-xylene are one of the important sources of energy being utilized with petrol/gasoline for vehicle fuel . All three compounds are produced during the process of making gasoline and other fuels from crude oil as well as in making coke from coal. Benzene have been used for long time in manufacturing plastics, detergents, pesticides, and other chemicals such as ethyl benzene, cyclohexane, nitrobenzene, chlorobenzenes and maleic anhydride [2,3]. Toluene has numerous commercial and industrial applications and was used as a solvent in paints, lacquers, thinners, glues, correction fluid, nail polish remover, and in printing and leather tanning processes. p-xylene has been used in adhesives industry, paint industry, and as manufacturing solvent in rubber industries . Molecule wise production, air contamination, World Health Organization (WHO) permissible limit, and percentage use of these compounds in petroleum products are shown in Table 1. Besides their importance, benzene has acute toxicity than the other components, toluene and p-xylene. Because of their low water solubility, acute toxicity and genotoxicity, benzene derivatives were classified as priority pollutants by the US Environmental Protection Agency . The evidence for carcinogenicity of benzene in humans was evaluated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in 1982. Benzene, toluene and p-xylene can cause damage to the haematopoietic system, including pancytopenia . While toluene and p-xylene have no direct effect on human, it was believed that cancer risks associated with toluene or p-xylene because of benzene impurities . The prime sources of air and aquifer contamination by these molecules were due to the sequences of accidental gasoline spills, evaporation from petroleum refineries and leakage from service station tanks . Benzene and naphthalene have less frequently degraded chemically than substituted aromatics. These substituted and non-substituted hydrocarbons have degraded by catabolically active bacteria or gasoline-degrading microorganisms for the purposes of in situ aquifer bioremediation, suggesting co-oxidative or syntrophism processes [9,10].
Rate of chemical reaction depends on the mass of the nucleus, and isotopic substitutions slightly affect the partitioning of energy within molecules. These deviations from perfect chemical equivalence are termed isotope effects. Absolute abundances of isotopes are commonly reported in terms of atom percent.
For example, 13C, atom percent 13C=[13C/(12C + 13C)]100
Various applications of isotope abundance study includes (a) the distribution of contaminant sources of any molecule on a native, regional, and global scale, (b) the identification and quantification of alteration reactions and (c) the characterization of elementary reaction mechanisms that govern product formation .
The stability of benzene derivatives could be enhanced by Mr. Trivedi’s unique biofield treatment which is already known to alter the physical, and structural properties of various living and non-living substances . Scientists have postulated that it is due to the flow of bioelectricity in the human body. When an electrical signal passes through any material, a magnetic field is generated in the surrounding space . Human has the ability to harness energy from environment/ universe and can transmit into any object (living or non-living) around the globe. The object(s) always receive the energy and responded into useful way that is called biofield energy. This process is known as biofield treatment. Mr. Trivedi’s unique biofield treatment is also called as The Trivedi Effect®, which known to alter the physical, structural and atomic properties in various metals [14-16] and ceramics [17,18] in material science. Additionally, biofield treatment has been studied in the field of microbiology [19,12], biotechnology [20,21], and agriculture [22- 24]. We have reported that biofield treatment has substantial altered the atomic, structural and physical properties in silicon carbides  and carbon allotropes . Based on the outstanding results achieved by biofield treatment on metals and ceramics, an attempt was made to evaluate the effect of biofield treatment on isotopic abundance ratio of either 13C/12C or 2H/1H (i.e., PM+1/PM) in treated samples of benzene, toluene and p-xylene as compared to control.
Benzene was procured from Qualigens Fine Chemicals, India. Toluene was procured from Merck India and p-xylene was procured from Research lab, India.
Biofield treatment modalities
Benzene derivatives (Benzene, Toluene and p-xylene) were taken in this experiment for biofield treatment. The compounds were divided into two parts named as control and treated. No treatment was given to this set. The second set (T1, T2, and T3) of benzene derivatives was handed over to Mr. Trivedi for biofield energy treatment under standard laboratory conditions. Mr. Trivedi provided the biofield treatment through his energy transmission process to second sets of samples without touching the samples. After treatment, the treated samples were stored at standard conditions for GC-MS analysis as per the standard protocol. An optimum precautionary measure was taken throughout the experiment. The experimental results in treated groups were analysed and compared with the untreated (control) set.
The gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) analysis was performed on Perkin Elmer/auto system XL with Turbo mass, USA, having detection limit up to 1 picogram. For GC-MS analysis the treated sample was further divided into three parts as T1, T2 and T3. The GCMS data was obtained in the form of % abundance vs. mass to charge ratio (m/z), which is known as mass spectrum. The isotopic abundance ratio of 13C/12C or 2H/1H (PM+1/PM) was expressed by its deviation in treated samples as compared to the control. The percentage change in PM+1/PM isotopic ratio was calculated on a percentage scale. The values PM+1/PM of treated samples were calculated from the following formula:
Where, RTreated and RControl are the ratio of intensity at PM+1 to PM in mass spectra of treated and control samples respectively.
Results and Discussion
The mass spectra of control and treated samples of benzene, toluene and p-xylene are shown in (Figures 2-10).
GC-MS spectra of benzene: Base peak was observed at m/z=78 in control and treated samples (T1 and T2) (Figure 2), whereas in T3 sample, the most intense peak was found at m/z=77 (Figure 3). The intensity ratio of PM+1 and PM peaks are presented in (Table 2). Three major peaks at m/z=50, 39 and 26 were observed in control benzene sample due to degradation of benzene to C4H2, C3H3 and C2H2 ions. Peak at m/z=50 in control was observed after leaving an ethylene fragment from benzene. Benzene after breaking into two equal parts showed peak at m/z=39 in control. Finally, acetylene was produced in benzene fragmentation which was seen at m/z=26 in control. More importantly the treated benzene samples were fragmented in to four major peaks at m/z=63, 50, 39 and 26. Three peaks (except peak at m/ z=63) were same for both treated and control samples of benzene. This peak at m/z=63 was responsible for leaving one methyl group after ring opening (due to C5H3) .
Isotopic abundance ratio of 13C/12C, or 2H/1H (PM+1/PM) in control and treated benzene was calculated and presented in the (Figure 4). In the bar diagram, the isotopic abundance ratio of PM+1/ PM of treated benzene ring was decreased up to 42.14% after biofield treatment as compared to control. In mass spectrum, number of stable fragments were increased by one (3→4 peaks from control to treated) in treated sample of benzene as compared to control. The decreased isotopic abundance ratio of PM+1/PM in treated benzene (Figure 4) samples may be due to decrease μ (reduced mass) and binding energy in molecules with lighter isotopes.
GC-MS spectra of toluene: Molecular ion peak was observed at m/z=92 in both control and as well as treated samples with different intensity ratio (Figures 5-6). The intensity ratio of PM peak and PM+1 peak are given in (Table 3). Other than the base peak, four major peaks at m/z=63, 51, 39, and 26 were observed for both control and treated samples of toluene due to C5H3, C4H2, C3H3 and C2H2 ions, respectively. Peak at m/z=63 was observed due to fragmentation of toluene to C5H3 and ethylene. Peak at m/z=51 was observed after leaving an ethylene and methyl fragment during the process of toluene fragmentation. One low intensity peak at m/z=77 was observed due to the formation of benzyl ion (C6H5) which was further degraded to propa-1,2-diene radicals and acetylene, responsible for the intense peak at m/z=39 and m/z=26 and respectively. Fragmentation pattern and number of fragmented peaks were same for control and treated toluene samples. Isotopic abundance ratio of 13C/12C, or 2H/1H (PM+1/PM) of control and treated toluene was calculated and presented as bar diagram in the Figure 7. In the bar diagram, the isotopic abundance ratio of PM+1/PM of treated toluene was increased significantly up to 531.61% (in T1) after biofield treatment as compared to control. Atoms taking part in chemical bonds with higher isotopic number might have higher binding energy with increased μ (reduced mass) and vice versa. Thus the increased isotopic abundance ratio of PM+1/PM in toluene might increase the reduced mass and binding energy after biofield treatment that may enhance the stability of toluene significantly .
Mixed with petrol (%)
WHO permissible limit (ppb)
World production (million tons)
Table 1: Benzene, toluene and p-xylene compounds with production, utility and pollution data.
Peak Intensity at m/z=78 (PM)
Peak Intensity at m/z=79 (PM+1)
Ratio of peak intensity (PM+1/PM) at m/z=79 to m/z= 78
Table 2: GC-MS isotopic abundance analysis result of benzene.
Peak Intensity at m/z=92 (PM)
Peak Intensity at m/z=93 (PM+1)
Ratio of peak intensity (PM+1/PM) at m/z=92 to m/z=93
Table 3: GC-MS isotopic abundance analysis result of toluene.
Peak Intensity at m/z=106 (PM)
Peak Intensity at m/z=107 (PM+1)
Ratio of peak intensity (PM+1/PM) at m/z=107 to m/z=106
Table 4: GC-MS isotopic abundance analysis result of p-xylene.
Reduced mass (mAmB /(mA + mB)
Table 5: Possible isotopic and non-isotopic bonds and calculated values of μ in benzene, toluene and p-xylene. mA: Mass of atom A; mB: Mass of atom B; Here, A may be C or H and so on.
GC-MS spectra of p-xylene: Molecular ion peak was observed at m/z=106 in both control and treated samples with different intensity ratio (Figures 8-9). The intensity ratio of PM+1 and PM peaks are given in (Table 4). Other than the molecular ion peak (at m/z=106), six major peaks at m/z=91, 77, 63, 51, 39, and 26 were observed in both control and treated samples of p-xylene in the mass spectrum due to C7H7, C6H5, C5H3, C4H2, C3H3 and C2H2 ions, respectively. We have already discussed about the origin of all six peaks following the degradation pattern of benzene and toluene for both control and treated in toluene. Fragmentation pattern and number fragmented peaks were same (total 7 peaks) for control and treated p-xylene samples. Isotopic abundance ratio of 13C/12C, or 2H/1H (PM+1/PM) of control and treated p-xylene were calculated and presented in the Figure 10. In the bar diagram, the isotopic abundance ratio of PM+1/PM of treated p-xylene was increased up to 134.34% (for T1) after biofield treatment as compared to control. Increased isotopic abundance ratio of PM+1/PM in treated samples of p-xylene may increase binding energy of respective bonds which might increase chemical stability of p-xylene. This suggested that, 12C and 1H atoms in treated toluene and p-xylene probably transformed into 13C and 2H, respectively by capturing one neutron thereby increased the ratio. The inter-conversion of 13C and 12C can be possible if a nuclear level reaction including the neutron and proton occurr after biofield treatment. Thus, it is assumed that biofield treatment possibly induced the nuclear level reactions, which may lead to alter the 13C/12C in treated benzene, toluene and p-xylene samples. Possibly, in benzene, toluene and p-xylene molecules, various bonds might present such as 12C-12C, 1H-12C, 13C-12C, 2H-12C, 1H-13C, 2H-13C and 13C-13C. Reduced mass is calculated and presented in (Table 5). It is seen from the table that μ (reduced mass) of normal 12C-12C and 1H-12C bond was 6 and 0.923, respectively. It showed that reduced mass is increased in case of heavier isotope (i.e., 13C-13C=6.5, 2H-13C=1.04). It may enhance the bond strength, stability, and binding energy of toluene and p-xylene molecules .
In summary, the biofield treatment has significantly changed the isotopic ratio of (PM+1/PM) in benzene, toluene and p-xylene. Benzene molecule with lower isotopic ratio of (PM+1/PM), might have lower stability due to the decreased μ (reduced mass) and binding energy in molecules with lighter isotopes. In case of toluene and p-xylene, the isotopic abundance ratio of (PM+1/PM) treated samples increased significantly as compared to control. The increased isotopic abundance may increase the binding energy of the chemical bonds in toluene and p-xylene, with increased μ (reduced mass). The observed fragmentation pattern and number of fragmented peaks in mass spectra were same for control and treated toluene and p-xylene samples. These nuclear level transformations of 12C→13C or 1H→2H, were observed which probably induced through biofield treatment. Benzene was less frequently degraded bio-chemically than substituted aromatics i.e., toluene and p-xylene. The decreased isotopic ratio of (PM+1/PM) of benzene after biofield treatment might reduce its stability which could be helpful for biodegradation of benzene in bioremediation of benzene contaminated aquifers. On the contrary increased isotopic ratio of (PM+1/PM) in toluene and p-xylene may increase the stability of toluene and p-xylene may be useful as ingredient of gasoline.
The authors would like to acknowledge the whole team of Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility (SAIF), Nagpur and MGV Pharmacy College, Nasik for providing the instrumental facility. We are very grateful for the support of Trivedi Science, Trivedi Master Wellness and Trivedi Testimonials in this research work.
1. Cunha CD, Leite SGF (2000) Gasoline biodegradation in different soil microscoms. Braz J Microbiol 31: 45-49.
2. Lawson JF (1978) Emission Control Options For The Synthetic Organic Chemicals Manufacturing Industry: Maleic Anhydride Product Report. EPA Contract No. 68-02-2577.
3. Stranks DR, Heffernan ML, Lee KC, McTigue PT, Withers GRA (1970) Chemistry: A structural view. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
4. Lundberg I, Milatou-Smith R (1998) Mortality and cancer incidence among Swedish paint industry workers with long-term exposure to organic solvents. Scand J Work Environ Health 24: 270-275.
5. Dean BJ (1985) Recent findings on the genetic toxicology of benzene, toluene, xylenes and phenols. Mutat Res 154: 153-181.
6. McMichael AJ (1988) Carcinogenicity of benzene, toluene and p-xylene: Epidemiological and experimental evidence. IARC Sci Publ 85: 3 18.
7. Eriksson M, Swartling A, Dalhammar G, Fäldt J, Borg-Karlson AK (1998) Biological degradation of diesel fuel in water and soil monitored with solidphase microextraction and GC-MS. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 50: 129-134.
8. Barbee GC, Brown KW (1986) Movement of xylene through unsaturated soils following simulated spills. Water Air Soil Pollut 29: 321-331.
9. Ridgway HF, Safarik J, Phipps D, Carl P, Clark D (1990) Identification and catabolic activity of well-derived gasoline degrading bacteria from a contaminated aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 56: 3565-3575.
10. Leusch F, Bartkow M (2007) Draft toxicological profile for ethylbenzene. US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, USA.
11. Weisel CP, Park S, Pyo H, Giselawitz KM (2003) Use of stable isotopically labeled benzene to evaluate environmental exposures. J Exposure Anal Environ Epidemiol 13: 393-402.
12. Trivedi MK, Patil S, Shettigar H, Bairwa K, Jana S (2015) Phenotypic and biotypic characterization of Klebsiella oxytoca: An impact of biofield treatment. J Microb Biochem Technol 7: 202-205.
13. Maxwell JC (1865) A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 155: 459-512.
14. Trivedi MK, Patil S, Tallapragada RM (2012) Thought intervention through bio field changing metal powder characteristics experiments on powder characteristics at a PM plant. Future Control and Automation 173: 247-252.
15. Trivedi MK, Patil S, Tallapragada RM (2015) Effect of biofield treatment on the physical and thermal characteristics of aluminium powders. Ind Eng Manage 4: 151.
16. Trivedi MK, Patil S, Tallapragada RM (2013) Effect of biofield treatment on the physical and thermal characteristics of silicon, tin and lead powders. J Material Sci Eng 2: 125.
17. Trivedi MK, Patil S, Tallapragada RM (2013) Effect of biofield treatment on the physical and thermal characteristics of vanadium pentoxide powder. J Material Sci Eng S11: 001.
18. Trivedi MK, Nayak G, Patil S, Tallapragada RM, Latiyal O (2015) Studies of the atomic and crystalline characteristics of ceramic oxide nano powders after bio field treatment. Ind Eng Manage 4: 161.
19. Trivedi MK, Patil S, Shettigar H, Gangwar M, Jana S (2015) Antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of Pseudomonas fluorescens after biofield treatment. J Infect Dis Ther 3: 222.
20. Patil S, Nayak GB, Barve SS, Tembe RP, Khan RR (2012) Impact of biofield treatment on growth and anatomical characteristics of Pogostemon cablin (Benth.). Biotechnology 11: 154-162.
21. Nayak G, Altekar N (2015) Effect of biofield treatment on plant growth and adaptation. J Environ Health Sci 1: 1-9.
22. Shinde V, Sances F, Patil S, Spence A (2012) Impact of biofield treatment on growth and yield of lettuce and tomato. Aust J Basic & Appl Sci 6: 100-105.
23. Lenssen AW (2013) Biofield and fungicide seed treatment influences on soybean productivity, seed quality and weed community. Agricultural Journal 8: 138-143.
24. Sances F, Flora E, Patil S, Spence A, Shinde V (2013) Impact of biofield treatment on ginseng and organic blueberry yield. Agrivita J AgricSci 35: 22-29.
25. Trivedi MK, Tallapragada RM (2008) A transcendental to changing metal powder characteristics. Met Powder Rep 63: 22-28, 31.
26. Trivedi MK, Nayak G, Tallapragada RM, Patil S, Latiyal O, et al. (2015)Effect of biofield treatment on structural and morphological properties of silicon carbide. J Powder Metall Min 4.